Write your message
Volume 14, Issue 27 (7-2018)                   Marine Engineering 2018, 14(27): 11-20 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Heydari S M M, Mohammaditabar D, Raissi S. Developing an Analysis and Prioritization Method of the Marine Propulsion System Hazards . Marine Engineering 2018; 14 (27) :11-20
URL: http://marine-eng.ir/article-1-636-en.html
Developing an Analysis and Prioritization Method of the Marine Propulsion System Hazards
Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Heydari1 , Davood Mohammaditabar * 1, Sadigh Raissi1
1- Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (4341 Views)
The FMEA method is one of the safety and reliability management techniques, which is very effective in identifying and eliminating potential problems in the product design and production process. Despite the extensive use of the Risk Priority Number (RPN) in FMEA, it is criticized due to shortcomings such as the inability to analyze crashes with a common cause, high duplicate RPN values ​​and the lack of direct and indirect relationships among failures and the causes. Considering the importance of safety in marine industry, this paper describes the implementation of an aggregating method of TOPSIS and DEMATEL which is able to overcome common shortcoming of traditional RPN method in a marine propulsion system.  The implementation of the method in prioritizing the main root causes led to more desirable results compared to the traditional RPN and DEMATEL base methods.
Keywords: Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) Risk Priority Number (RPN) Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)
Full-Text [PDF 742 kb]   (2011 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Paper | Subject: Main Engine & Electrical Equipments
Received: 2017/08/18 | Accepted: 2018/05/30
References
1. Saynisch, M., (2005), Beyond Frontiers of Traditional Project Management: The Concept of "Project Management Second Order (PM-2)" as an Approach of Evolutionary Management, World Futures, Vol. 61, No. 8, p. 555-590. [DOI:10.1080/02604020500288109]
2. Miller, R. and Lessard, D., (2001), Understanding and managing risks in large engineering projects. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 19, No. 8, p. 437-443. [DOI:10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00045-X]
3. Tay, K.M. and Lim, C.P., (2006), Fuzzy FMEA with a guided rules reduction system for prioritization of failures, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 23, No. 8, p. 1047-1066. [DOI:10.1108/02656710610688202]
4. Chang, K.H., Chang, Y.C. and Lee,Y.T., (2014), Integrating TOPSIS and DEMATEL Methods to Rank the Risk of Failure of FMEA, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, Vol. 13, No. 6, p. 1229-1257. [DOI:10.1142/S0219622014500758]
5. Chin, K.S., Chan, A. and Yang, J.B., (2008), Development of a fuzzy FMEA based product design system, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 36, No. 7-8, p. 633-649. [DOI:10.1007/s00170-006-0898-3]
6. Bowles, J.B. and Peláez, C.E., (1995), Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 50, No. 2, p. 203-213. [DOI:10.1016/0951-8320(95)00068-D]
7. Wang, Y.M., Chin, K.S., Poon, G. K. K., and Yang, J.B. (2009), Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean, Expert systems with applications, Vol. 36, No. 2, p. 1195-1207. [DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.028]
8. Braglia, M., (2000), MAFMA: multi-attribute failure mode analysis, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 17, No. 9, p. 1017-1033. [DOI:10.1108/02656710010353885]
9. Liu, H.C., You, J.X., Ding, X.F., and Su, Q., (2015), Improving risk evaluation in FMEA with a hybrid multiple criteria decision making method, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 32, No., 7, p. 763-782.
10. Chang, K.H., Chang, Y.C. and Tsai, I.T., (2013), Enhancing FMEA assessment by integrating grey relational analysis and the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory approach, Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol. 31, p. 211-224. [DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.02.020]
11. Helvacioglu, S. and Ozen, E., (2014), Fuzzy based failure modes and effect analysis for yacht system design, Ocean Engineering, Vol. 79, p. 131-141. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.12.015]
12. Liu, H.C., You, J.X., Shan, M.M. and Shao, L.N., (2015), Failure mode and effects analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid TOPSIS approach, Soft Computing, Vol. 19, No. 4, p. 1085-1098. [DOI:10.1007/s00500-014-1321-x]
13. Song, W., Ming, X., Wu, Z. and Zhu, B., (2014), A rough TOPSIS approach for failure mode and effects analysis in uncertain environments, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, Vol. 30, No. 4, p. 473-486. [DOI:10.1002/qre.1500]
14. Vahdani, B., Salimi, M. and Charkhchian, M., (2015), A new FMEA method by integrating fuzzy belief structure and TOPSIS to improve risk evaluation process, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 77, No. 1-4, p. 357-368. [DOI:10.1007/s00170-014-6466-3]
15. Chang, K.H., (2014), A more general risk assessment methodology using a soft set-based ranking technique, Soft Computing, Vol. 18, No. 1, p. 169-183. [DOI:10.1007/s00500-013-1045-3]
16. Chang, K.H. and Cheng, C.H., (2011), Evaluating the risk of failure using the fuzzy OWA and DEMATEL method, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 22, No. 2, p. 113-129. [DOI:10.1007/s10845-009-0266-x]
17. Wang, X., Zhang, Y. and Shen, G., (2016), An improved FMECA for feed system of CNC machining center based on ICR and DEMATEL method, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 83, No. 1-4, p. 43-54. [DOI:10.1007/s00170-015-7551-y]
18. Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K., (1981), Methods for multiple attribute decision making, in Multiple attribute decision making, Springer, p. 58-191. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3]
19. Gabus, A. and Fontela, E., (1973), Perceptions of the world problematique: Communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility, Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Geneva, Switzerland.
20. Balin, A., Demirel, H. and Alarcin, F., (2015), A hierarchical structure for ship diesel engine trouble-shooting problem using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy VIKOR hybrid methods, Brodogradnja: Teorija i praksa brodogradnje i pomorske tehnike, Vol. 66, No. 1, p. 54-65.
21. MAN Diesel, (2009), MAN B&W S40MC-C9.2-TII Project Guide Camshaft Controlled Two stroke Engines, 6th edition, chapter 7, Denmark.
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
International Journal of Maritime Technology is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.