Write your message

XML Persian Abstract Print


1- M.Sc. Graduate, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
2- Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (28 Views)

Emergency ascent is a critical operational condition for submarines, during which complex hydrodynamic forces and nonlinear dynamic responses can significantly affect vehicle motion. Conventional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations can be computationally demanding when a large number of operating conditions must be evaluated. Therefore, this study investigates the capability of machine learning models to predict the dynamic responses of a small research submarine during emergency ascent. A dataset obtained from numerical simulations under different emergency ascent conditions was used to develop three machine learning models: Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). The models were trained to learn the nonlinear relationships between the input parameters and the submarine’s dynamic responses. Their predictive performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R²) and root mean square error (RMSE). The results showed that all three models achieved high predictive accuracy, with R² values greater than 0.98. Among the investigated models, MLP achieved the highest overall performance, with R² = 0.991 and RMSE = 0.033. XGBoost followed with R² = 0.987 and RMSE = 0.036, while Random Forest achieved R² = 0.982 and RMSE = 0.041. These results demonstrate the potential of machine learning models as an efficient computational approach for predicting submarine dynamic responses during emergency ascent

Full-Text [PDF 619 kb]   (13 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Paper | Subject: Submarine Hydrodynamic & Design
Received: 2026/05/24 | Accepted: 2026/10/5

References
1. Hou, Y., Duan, F., Zhu, W., Li, H., Shen, S., Shen, X., Wang, J., Huang, Y., Wei, W., Liu, X. and Liu, L., (2024), Time-sequenced hydrodynamics prediction system for underwater vehicles based on AI edge computing, Ocean Engineering, Vol. 294, 116797. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.116797. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.116797]
2. Hong, L., Wang, X. and Zhang, D.-S., (2024), CFD-based hydrodynamic performance investigation of autonomous underwater vehicles: A survey, Ocean Engineering, Vol. 305, 117911. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117911. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117911]
3. Chen, T., Fu, C., Zang, Z., Zhang, Q. and Li, J., (2026), Numerical investigations on the kinematic response of a submarine during emergency ascent subject to internal solitary waves, Ocean Engineering, Vol. 343, 123351. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.123351. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.123351]
4. Xiang, G., Ou, Y., Chen, J., Wang, W. and Wu, H., (2024), A study on the influence of unsteady forces on the roll characteristics of a submarine during free ascent from great depth, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, Vol. 12, 757. DOI: 10.3390/jmse12050757. [DOI:10.3390/jmse12050757]
5. Palaniappan, M., Jyothi, V.B.N., Chowdhury, T., et al., (2024), A method for evaluating safety reliability of descend/ascend drop-weight system and mission abort decision for deep-ocean scientific human submersibles, Scientific Reports, Vol. 14, 19266. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70158-3. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-70158-3] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Lee, J., Kim, S., Shin, J., Yoon, J., Ahn, J. and Kim, M., (2025), Experiment and modeling of submarine emergency rising motion using free-running model, International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Vol. 17, 100641. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2024.100641. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2024.100641]
7. Valentinis, F. and Woolsey, C., (2019), Nonlinear control of a subscale submarine in emergency ascent, Ocean Engineering, Vol. 171, p. 646-662. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.11.029. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.11.029]
8. Walker, J.M., Coraddu, A. and Oneto, L., (2024), A review on shape optimization of hulls and airfoils leveraging Computational Fluid Dynamics data-driven surrogate models, Ocean Engineering, Vol. 312, Part 3, 119263. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119263. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119263]
9. Maric, T., Fadeli, M.E., Rigazzi, A., et al., (2025), Combining machine learning with computational fluid dynamics using OpenFOAM and SmartSim, Meccanica, Vol. 60, p. 1831-1850. DOI: 10.1007/s11012-024-01797-z. [DOI:10.1007/s11012-024-01797-z]
10. Dong, Y., Du, L. and Li, G., (2025), Hybrid Ship Design Optimization Framework Integrating a Dual-Mode CFD-Surrogate Mechanism, Applied Sciences, Vol. 15, No. 19, 10318. DOI: 10.3390/app151910318. [DOI:10.3390/app151910318]
11. Rojas Cala, E.F., Béjar, R., Mateu, C., Borri, E. and Cabeza, L.F., (2025), Artificial Intelligence Applied to Computational Fluid Dynamics and Its Application in Thermal Energy Storage: A Bibliometric Analysis, Applied Sciences, Vol. 15, No. 13, 7199. DOI: 10.3390/app15137199. [DOI:10.3390/app15137199]
12. Chen, T., Li, R., Hu, X., Zhang, B., Liu, Y., Wang, L. and Gao, N., (2025), Machine learning as CFD surrogate models for rapid prediction of building-related physical fields: A review of methods and state-of-the-art, Building and Environment, Vol. 285, Part B, 113667. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113667. [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113667]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
International Journal of Maritime Technology is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.