Enter your email address
Submit
Write your message
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Science and technology of Mazandaran
2- 3 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Hormozgan
3- Undergraduate student, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Science and technology of Mazandaran
2- 3 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Hormozgan
3- Undergraduate student, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Science and technology of Mazandaran
Abstract: (65 Views)
With the expanding utilization of marine resources and the growing volume of maritime transportation, floating breakwaters have gained significant attention as efficient alternatives to conventional fixed structures, due to advantages such as mobility, reduced construction and installation costs, and minimized environmental impacts. Hydrodynamic modeling of these structures is typically conducted in both two-dimensional and three-dimensional frameworks. While two-dimensional models offer faster computations but are limited in applicability, three-dimensional models-despite their higher computational demand-enable a more comprehensive and accurate assessment of complex wave–structure interactions. In this study, a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model was developed to compare the performance of floating breakwaters with F-shaped and rectangular cross-sections under a range of geometric and hydrodynamic conditions. Simulations were performed in both frequency and time domains, focusing on key parameters including draft depth, structure length, and wave frequency. Fundamental hydrodynamic coefficients, namely added mass and radiation damping, were computed, and their influence on the response amplitude operator (RAO) was examined. The findings reveal that the F-shaped configuration, within specific frequency ranges—particularly for heave and pitch motions—demonstrates superior capability in reducing motion amplitudes and dissipating wave energy, whereas the rectangular configuration delivers more stable and uniform performance over a broader spectrum of wave conditions. Parametric analyses further highlight that cross-sectional geometry not only governs hydrodynamic efficiency but also shapes environmental impacts related to flow patterns and sediment transport. These results provide actionable insights for the design and optimization of high-performance, environmentally sustainable floating breakwaters.
Keywords: Floating Breakwater, Dynamic Analysis, Frequency Response of Structure, Wave Energy Control
Type of Study: Research Paper |
Subject:
Offshore Hydrodynamic
Received: 2025/09/24 | Accepted: 2026/01/6
Received: 2025/09/24 | Accepted: 2026/01/6
فایل صوتی چکیده مقاله [MP3 2848 KB] (1 Download)
References
1. A.S. Koraim., (2015), Mathematical study for analyzing caisson breakwater supported by two rows of piles, Journal of Ocean Engineering. 104 89-106.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.088 [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.088.]
2. T. Yamamoto., (1981), Moored floating breakwater response to regular and irregular waves, Journal of Applied Ocean Research. 3 27-36. [DOI:10.1016/0141-1187(81)90082-1]
3. M.Qorbani Fouladi, F. Bahmanpouri, S. Rezazadeh, F. Kollolemad, M. Mashayekhi, G. Viccione., (2023), Investigating the sidewall's effects on π-shaped floating breakwaters interacting with water waves by the scaled boundary FEM, Journal of Ocean Engineering. 284.115200.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115200 [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115200.]
4. M. Qorbani Fouladi, H. Heidary-Torkamani, L. Tao, B. Ghiasi., (2021), Solving Wave Interaction with a Floating Breakwater in Finite Water Depth Using Scaled Boundary FEM, Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering.64249.
https://doi.org/10.52547/nmce.6.1.42 [DOI:10.52547/nmce.6.1.42.]
5. C.Y. Ji, X. Chen, J. Cui, Z.M. Yuan, A. Incecik,. (2015), Experimental study of a new type of floating breakwater, Journal of Ocean Engineering,105295303. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.046]
6. Z. Liu, Y. Wang, (2020), Numerical studies of submerged moored box-type floating breakwaters with different shapes of cross-sections using SPH, Journal of Coastal Engineering,158103687.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2020.103687 [DOI:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2020.103687.]
7. K.Z. Hu, T.J. Xu, S. Wang, (2025), Hydrodynamic investigation of a new type of floating breakwaters integrated with porous baffles, Journal of Applied Ocean Research, 154 104380. [DOI:10.1016/j.apor.2024.104380]
8. Z. Deng, L. Wang, X. Zhao, Z. Huang, (2019), Hydrodynamic performance of a T-shaped floating breakwater, Journal of Applied Ocean Research, 82 325-336.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2018.11.002 [DOI:10.1016/j.apor.2018.11.002.]
9. B. Li, L. Cheng, A.J. Deeks, B. Teng, (2005), A modified scaled boundary finite-element method for problems with parallel side-faces. Part II. Application and evaluation, Journal of Applied Ocean Research. 27 224-234.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2005.11.007 [DOI:10.1016/j.apor.2005.11.007.]
10. B.Z. Zhou, G.X. Wu, Q.C. (2016), Meng, Interactions of fully nonlinear solitary wave with a freely floating vertical cylinder, Journal of Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements.69119-131.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2016.05.004 [DOI:10.1016/j.enganabound.2016.05.004.]
11. A. Kang, P. Lin, Y.J. Lee, B. Zhu,. (2015), Numerical simulation of wave interaction with vertical circular cylinders of different submergences using immersed boundary method, Journal of Computers and Fluids. 106 41-53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.09.043 [DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.09.043.]
12. S. Ganesan T., D. Sen, (2016), Time domain simulation of side-by-side floating bodies using a 3D numerical wave tank approach, Journal of Applied Ocean Research. 58 189-217.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2016.03.014 [DOI:10.1016/j.apor.2016.03.014.]
13. D. Li, V. Panchang, Z. Tang, Z. Demirbilek, J. Ramsden,. (2005), Evaluation of an approximate method for incorporating floating docks in harbor wave prediction models, Candidate Journal of Civil Engineering. 32 1082-1092.
https://doi.org/10.1139/l05-059 [DOI:10.1139/l05-059.]
14. A. Cheema, M. Zhu, S. Chai, C.K.H. Chin, Y. Jin., (2014), Motion response of a floating offshore wind turbine foundation, Proc. 19th Australas. Fluid Mechanical Conference..
15. C.M. Wang, Z.Y. Tay, Very large floating structures: Applications, research and development, Journal of Procedia Engineering. 14 (2011) 62-72.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.007 [DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.007.]
16. A.G. Abul-Azm, M.R. Gesraha, Approximation to the hydrodynamics of floating pontoons under oblique waves, Journal of Ocean Engineering. 27 (2000) 365-384.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-8018(98)00057-2 [DOI:10.1016/S0029-8018(98)00057-2.]
17. M.R. Gesraha, Analysis of Π shaped floating breakwater in oblique waves: I. Impervious rigid wave boards, Appl. Journal of Ocean Research. 28 (2006) 327-338.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2007.01.002 [DOI:10.1016/j.apor.2007.01.002.]
18. M.Qorbani. Fouladi, P. Badiei, S. Vahdani, A study on full interaction of water waves with moored rectangular floating breakwater by applying 2DV scaled boundary finite element method, Journal of Ocean Engineering. 220 (2021) 108450.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108450 [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108450.]
19. M.Qorbani. Fouladi, P. Badiei, S. Vahdani, Extracting the Solution of Three-Dimensional Wave Diffraction Problem from Two-Dimensional Analysis by Introducing an Artificial Neural Network for Floating Objects, Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures. 17 (2020) e324.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78256096 [DOI:10.1590/1679-78256096.]
20. S.Nemati, M. Bakhtiari, M. Azami. Investigation of Wave-Structure Interaction in Floating Breakingwaters. Journal of Hydrosciences and Environment, 5(9), 2021,8-20. [DOI:1022111/JHE.2022.42343.1079]
21. E. Koutandos, P. Prinos, and X. Gironella, Floating breakwaters under regular and irregular wave forcing: reflection and transmission characteristics. Journal of hydraulic Research, 43(2): 174-188, 2005.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2005.9641234 [DOI:10.1080/00221686.2005.9641234.]
22. D.L. Kriebel and C.A. Bollmann. Wave transmission past vertical wave barriers. In COASTAL ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2 (1996) 2470-2483.
https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784402429.191 [DOI:10.1061/9780784402429.1.]
23. F. Ursell. The effect of a fixed vertical barrier on surface waves in deep water. In Proceeding of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 43 (1974) 374-382.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100023604 [DOI:10.1017/S0305004100023604.]
24. R.L,Wigel, 1960, Transmission of waves Past a Rigid Vertical Thin Barrier, Journal of the waterways and Harbors Division, ASCE, 86 (1960), 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1061/JWHEAU.0000153 [DOI:10.1061/JWHEAU.00001.]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
International Journal of Maritime Technology is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.