پیام خود را بنویسید
دوره 20، شماره 43 - ( 4-1403 )                   جلد 20 شماره 43 صفحات 54-41 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها

XML English Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
ardeshiri S, dehghanmanshadi M, rashidi A J. Investigating the changes of the submarine bare-hull resistance in different scales by CFD method. Marine Engineering 2024; 20 (43) :41-54
URL: http://marine-eng.ir/article-1-1111-fa.html
اردشیری سجاد، دهقان منشادی مجتبی، رشیدی علی جبار. بررسی محاسبه مقاومت بدنه زیردریایی در مقیاس‌های مختلف به روش عددی. مهندسی دریا. 1403; 20 (43) :41-54

URL: http://marine-eng.ir/article-1-1111-fa.html

بررسی محاسبه مقاومت بدنه زیردریایی در مقیاس‌های مختلف به روش عددی
سجاد اردشیری* 1، مجتبی دهقان منشادی1 ، علی جبار رشیدی1
1- دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتر
چکیده:   (296 مشاهده)
یکی از موضوعات مهم در طراحی یک زیردریایی محاسبات مقاومت و توان آن می‌باشد. در استخراج ضرایب مقاومت یک زیردریایی، هنوز محاسبه و تعمیم نتایج از یک مدل  مقیاس شده به شناور اصلی به صورت یک چالش علمی مطرح می‌باشد. در این مطالعه، تاثیر مقیاس در روش عددی بر روی ضرایب مقاومت یک زیردریایی شامل ضرایب مقاومت کل، اصطکاکی و فشاری به روش شبیه‌سازی عددی مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. همچنین دقت نتایج روابط تجربی موجود جهت محاسبه‌ ضرایب مقاومت زیردریایی ارزیابی شده است. مدل زیردریایی سابوف برای انجام مطالعات استفاده گردید. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که روابط تجربی موجود، محاسبه ضریب اصطکاکی را با خطای کمتر از 10 درصد، ضریب فشاری را با خطای کمتر از 30 درصد، و ضریب درگ کل را با خطای کمتر از 5/8 درصد ممکن  می‌سازد.
واژه‌های کلیدی: مقیاس، ضرایب هیدرودینامیکی، شناور زیرسطحی، سابوف، بررسی عددی
متن کامل [PDF 1887 kb]   (103 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: مقاله پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: طراحي، هیدروديناميك و ساخت زيرسطحي
دریافت: 1403/2/22 | پذیرش: 1403/5/9
فهرست منابع
1. S. Savas, D. Ali, D. Cihad, and B. Sakir , (2018). Investigation of self-propulsion of DARPA Suboff by RANS method, Ocean Engineering,vol.150,pp.1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.12.051 [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.12.051.]
2. S. B. Furkan Cavdar, (2022). An Investigation of Hydrodynamic Maneuvering Derivatives and Horizontal Stability of Darpa Suboff Depending on Depth, GMO Journal of Ship and Marine Technology, no. 221. https://doi.org/10.54926/gdt.1084413 [DOI:10.54926/gdt.1084413.]
3. W. Sun, Q. Hu, S. Hu, J. Su, J. Xu, J. Wei and G. Huang, (2020). Numerical analysis of fullscale ship self-propulsion performance with direct comparison to statistical sea trail results, Journal of Marine Science Engineering, p. 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8010024 [DOI:10.3390/jmse8010024.]
4. H. Jasak, V. Vukˇcevi'c, I. Gatin and I. Lalovi'c, (2019). CFD validation and grid sensitivity studies of full scale ship self propulsion, Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, pp. 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2017.12.004 [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2017.12.004.]
5. V. Bertram, Practical Ship Hydrodynamics, (2014). 2 ed., Elsevier Science.
6. L. Larsson, F. Stern and M. Visonneau, (2014). Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-94-007-7189-5]
7. D. Ponkratov and C. Zegos,(2015). Validation of ship scale CFD self-propulstion simulation by the direct comparison with sea trials results, in Forth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Austin.
8. H. A. Jackson, Submarine Design Notes, (1980). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
9. H. Mikkelsen and J. H. Walther, (2020). Effect of roughness in full-scale validation of a CFD model of self-propelled ships, Applied Ocean Research, vol. 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2020.102162 [DOI:10.1016/j.apor.2020.102162.]
10. M. Moonesun , Y. M. Korol , V. A. Nikrasov , A. Ursalov , A. Brajhko, (2016). CFD analysis of the bow shapes of submarines, Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, vol. III, no. 1, pp. 1-16, 2016. https://jsaer.com/download/vol-3-iss-1-2016/JSAER2016-03-01-01-16.pdf.
11. M. Moonesun , Y. M. Korol , V. A. Nikrasov , A. Ursalov , A. Brajhko, (2015). Power series optimization for submarine bare hull form, Turkish Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, vol. 1, pp. 11-19.
12. Y. M. Korol, M Moonesun, (2015). Minimum Immersion Depth for EliminatingFree Surface Effect on Submerged Submarine Resistance, Turkish Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology (TUJEST), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 36-46.
13. M. Moonesun , Y. M. Korol , V. A. Nikrasov , A. Ursalov , A. Brajhko, (2016).Bottom effect on the submarine moving close to the sea bottom, The Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 106-113. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331001062_Bottom_effect_on_the_submarine_moving_close_to_the_sea_bottom.
14. P. C. Mohammad Moonesun, 2012. General arrangement and naval architecture aspects in midget submarines, in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Underwater System Technology Theory and Applications, Malaysia.
15. M. Moonesun, F. Ghasemzadeh,3 Y.Korol, N. Valeri,1 A. Yastreba, A.Ursalov (2017), Effective depth of regular wave on submerged submarines and AUVs, International Robotics & Automation Journal, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 208-216. DOI: 10.15406/iratj.2017.02.00037. [DOI:10.15406/iratj.2017.02.00037]
16. M.Moonesun, Y. M. Korol, S.H. Moosavizadegan, H. Dalayeli, A. Mahdian, M. Javadi, A. Brazhko, (2016). Wave making system in submarines at surface condition, NISCAIR-CSIR,India. https://nopr.niscpr.res.in/bitstream/123456789/34858/1/IJMS%2045(1)%2044-53.pdf
17. T. Aliakbari , M. Adjami, M. Moonesun , ,(2023). An experimental study of stabilizing ordinary fishing nets (SOFNets) on a stationary SWATH ship seakeeping behavior under irregular waves, Ocean Engineering, vol. 283, pp. 115-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115191 [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115191.]
18. E. Asadi Asrami, M. Moonesun,F. Aziz Abi,(2021). Computational fluid dynamics and experimental hydrodynamic analysis of a solar AUV. Computer Assisted Methods in Engineering and Science, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 57-77. DOI:10.24423/cames.301
19. N. Khanmoradi , M.Moonesun, S. Jafari Horestani, (2023). Calculation of Hydrodynamics Resistance Coefficient of Diver by CFD Method, Journal of Hydraulic and Water Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 99-107. DOI: 10.61186/ijmt.18.15. [DOI:10.61186/ijmt.18.15]
20. E. Asadi Asrami, S. Ardeshiri M. Adjami M. Moonesun,(2023). Experimental Results of an Underwater Glider Hydraulic Model Test in Towing Tank of NIMALA, Journal of Hydraulic and Water Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31-40 . DOI:10.22044/JHWE.2023.12852.1006.
21. N. Khanmoradi , M.Moonesun, S. Jafari Horestani,(2023), Calculation of Hydrodynamics Resistance Coefficient of Diver by CFD Method at Free Surface Condition, International Journal of Maritime Technology, vol. 18, pp. 15-24, 2023. DOI: 10.61186/ijmt.18.15 [DOI:10.61186/ijmt.18.15]
22. A Gharechae, M.Moonesun, (2023) , Semi-analytical study of linear waves interaction with a vertical permeable cylinder of arbitrary cross-section based on perturbation theory, Ships and Offshore Structures, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 645-669. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2023.2200335 [DOI:10.1080/17445302.2023.220033.]
23. Julia Bodnarchuk, Y. Karol, M.Moonesun, (2020). A Study of the Effect of Recesses on the Motion Resistance of Submarines by Methods of Computational Fluid Dynamics," Восточно-Европейский журнал передовых технологий, vol. 5, no. 7-107, pp. 82-88. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2020.212005. [DOI:10.15587/1729-4061.2020.212005]
24. M. Moonesun, Y. Karol. H. Dalayeli, (2015). CFD analysis on the bare hull form of submarines for minimizing the resistance, International Journal of Maritime Technology, vol. 3, pp. 1-16. DOI: 20.1001.1.23456000.2015.3.0.6.8
25. Y. Karol. M. Moonesan, (2015). Naval Submarine Body Form Design and Hydrodynamics, Germany: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing.
26. A.F. Molland, S.R. Turnock, D.A. Hudson, (2017). Ship Resistance And Propulsion, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316494196 [DOI:10.1017/9781316494196.]
27. L. Birk, (2019). Fundamentals of Ship Hydrodynamics, Padstow, Cornwall, Great Britain: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. DOI:10.1002/9781119191575. [DOI:10.1002/9781119191575]
28. • V. Bertram, (2012).Submarine hull design, Engineering, Environmental Science.
29. S. F. HOERNER, (1965). Fluid-Dynamic Drag Practical Information On Aerodynamic Drag And Hydrodynamic Resistance, Bakersfield, CA, USA: Published by the Author.
30. H. Blasius, (1950). The Boundary Layers In Fluids with Little Friction, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.
31. X. Ling, Zhi, Q. Leong, J. Duffy,(2023). Effects of pitch angle on a near free surface underwater vehicle, Ocean Engineering, p. 115611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115611 [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115611.]
32. R. H. Nunn, (1989). Intermediate Fluid Mechanics, 270 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10016: Taylor & Francis Group.
33. P. M. Sforza, (2014). Commercial Airplane Design Principles, Butterworth-Heinemann. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-419953-8.00005-X]
34. K. G. Hermann Schlichting, (2017). Boundary-Layer Theory, 9 ed., vol. 1, K. Mayes, Ed., Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52919-5 [DOI:10.1007/978-3-662-52919-5.]
35. A.Morrall, (1957), 1957 Ittc Model-Shipcorrelation Line Values Offrictional Resistancecoefficient.
36. F. M. White, (2016). Mechanics Fluid, New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Education.
37. D. C. Wilcox, (2006). Turbulence Modeling for CFD In: Industries, 3 ed., Canada: D.C.W.
38. ITTC(2017), Uncertainty Analysis is CFD Verification and Validation, Methodology and Procedures.
39. P. J. Roache,(1998). Verification Of Codes And Calculations, AIAA JOURNAL, vol. 36, May. [DOI:10.2514/3.13882]
40. T. Tezdogan, Y. K. Demirel, P. Kellett, M. Khorasanchi, A. Incecik and O. Turan, (2015). Full-scale unsteady RANS CFD simulations of ship behaviour and performance inhead seas due to slow steaming, Ocean Engineering, pp. 186-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.01.011 [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.01.011.]
41. Y. H. Ozdemir, T. Cosgun, A. Dogrul and B. Barlas, 2016. A numerical application to predict the resistance and wave pattern of KRISO container ship, Brodogradnja, vol. 67, pp.47-65. https://doi.org/10.21278/brod67204 [DOI:10.21278/brod67204.]
42. N. C. Groves, T. T. Huang and M. S. Chang, (1989). Geometric characteristics of darpa suboff models (dtrc model nos. 5470 and 5471).
43. ITTC, (2011). Recommended Procedures and Guidlines Resistance Test.
44. O. F. S. Omer K Kinaci and S. Bal, (2016). Prediction of wave resistance by aReynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equation-based computational fluiddynamics approach, J Engineering for the Maritime Environment, pp.1-18,June. DOI:10.1177/1475090215599180 [DOI:10.1177/1475090215599180]
45. C. L. Warren, (1997). Submarine design optimization using boundary layer control.
46. D. Ponkratov, (2016). Lloyd's Register Workshop on Ship Scale Hydrodynamics, UK.
47. C. D. A. D. M. A. Savas Sezen, (2021). An investigation of scale effects on the self-propulsion characteristics of a submarine, Applied Ocean Research, vol. 113, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2021.102728 [DOI:10.1016/j.apor.2021.102728.]
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول

بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

Creative Commons License
International Journal of Maritime Technology is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.