Enter your email address
Submit
Write your message
Volume 14, Issue 28 (1-2019)
Marine Engineering 2019, 14(28): 109-116 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Taherkhani A, Akbari H. Wave interaction with caisson breakwater considering large sliding movements in mesh-free Lagrangian coordinate. Marine Engineering 2019; 14 (28) :109-116
URL: http://marine-eng.ir/article-1-647-en.html
URL: http://marine-eng.ir/article-1-647-en.html
1- Tarbiat Modares University
Abstract: (18405 Views)
An important point in design of coastal structures is their structural response to design waves. In this study, wave interaction with a caisson breakwater is studied numerically by means of a modified SPH method. An efficient method is introduced to take into account the static and dynamic sliding forces at the interface boundary beneath the caisson. After a validation test, a time history analysis is done to investigate the structural response of a caisson breakwater against waves. The results are compared with experimental data as well as with similar numerical outcomes. There are good compatibilities between the experiments and the predicted values regarding both caisson movements and applied wave forces. In addition, three different solid boundary conditions are applied and it is concluded that utilizing a dynamic boundary condition is computationally efficient and numerically appropriate for modeling the problems involve with solid-fluid interactions.
Keywords: Caisson breakwater, Modified boundary condition, Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamic, Dynamic boundary condition
Type of Study: Technical Note |
Subject:
Marine Structures and near shore
Received: 2017/12/5 | Accepted: 2018/11/26
Received: 2017/12/5 | Accepted: 2018/11/26
References
1. Goda, Y. and H. Takagi, A reliability design method of caisson breakwaters with optimal wave heights. Coastal Engineering Journal, 2000. 42(04): p. 357-387 [DOI:10.1142/S0578563400000183]
2. Yuan-Zhan, W., C. Nan-Nan, and C. Li-Hua, Numerical simulation on joint motion process of various modes of caisson breakwater under wave excitation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 2006. 22(6): p. 535-545
3. Esteban, M., et al. Laboratory experiments on the sliding failure of a caisson breakwater subjected to solitary wave attack. in The Eighth ISOPE Pacific/Asia Offshore Mechanics Symposium. 2008. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
4. Panahi, R., E. Jahanbakhsh, and M.S. Seif, Development of a VoF-fractional step solver for floating body motion simulation. Applied Ocean Research, 2006. 28(3): p. 171-181 [DOI:10.1016/j.apor.2006.08.004]
5. Kleefsman, K., et al. An improved volume-of-fluid method for wave impact problems. in The Fourteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. 2004. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
6. Hadžić, I., et al., Computation of flow-induced motion of floating bodies. Applied mathematical modelling, 2005. 29(12): p. 1196-1210 [DOI:10.1016/j.apm.2005.02.014]
7. Manenti, S., et al. SPH simulation of a floating body forced by regular waves. in Proceedings of 3rd SPHERIC Workshop. 2008.
8. Ruol, P. and L. Martinelli, Wave flume investigation on different mooring systems for floating breakwaters, in Coastal Structures 2007: (In 2 Volumes). 2009, World Scientific. p. 327-338. [DOI:10.1142/9789814282024_0030]
9. Jian, W., et al., Smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations of dam-break flows around movable structures. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 2016. 26(01): p. 33-40 [DOI:10.17736/ijope.2016.ak08]
10. Rogers, B.D., R.A. Dalrymple, and P.K. Stansby, Simulation of caisson breakwater movement using 2-D SPH. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2010. 48(S1): p. 135-141 [DOI:10.1080/00221686.2010.9641254]
11. Monaghan, J. and A. Kos, Solitary waves on a Cretan beach. Journal of waterway, port, coastal, and ocean engineering, 1999. 125(3): p. 145-155. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1999)125:3(145)]
12. Wendland, H., Piecewise polynomial, positive definite and compactly supported radial functions of minimal degree. Advances in computational Mathematics, 1995. 4(1): p 389-396. [DOI:10.1007/BF02123482]
13. Monaghan, J.J., Simulating free surface flows with SPH. Journal of computational physics 1994. 110(2): p. 399-406 [DOI:10.1006/jcph.1994.1034]
14. Monaghan, J.J., Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics, 1992. 30 (1): p. 543-574. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.002551]
15. Altomare, C., et al. Numerical wave dynamics using Lagrangian approach: wave generation and passive & active wave absorption. in 10th SPHERIC International Workshop. 2015.
16. Crespo, A., M. Gómez-Gesteira, and R.A.J.C.-T.S.P.-. Dalrymple, Boundary conditions generated by dynamic particles in SPH methods. 2007. 5(3): p. 173.
17. Dalrymple, R.A. and O. Knio. SPH modelling of water waves. in Coastal Dynamics' 2001, 01.
18. Stewart, D.E., Rigid-body dynamics with friction and impact. SIAM review, 2000. 42(1): p. 3-39. [DOI:10.1137/S0036144599360110]
19. Olsson, H., et al., Friction models and friction compensation. European journal of control, 1998. 4(3): p. 176-195. [DOI:10.1016/S0947-3580(98)70113-X]
20. Kawachi, K., H. Suzuki, and F. Kimura. Technical issues on simulating impulse and friction in three dimensional rigid body dynamics. in Computer Animation 98. Proceedings. 1998. IEEE. [DOI:10.1109/CA.1998.681922]
21. Tanimoto, K. and S. Takahashi, Design and construction of caisson breakwaters—the Japanese experience. Coastal engineering, 1994. 22(1-2): p. 57-77. [DOI:10.1016/0378-3839(94)90048-5]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
International Journal of Maritime Technology is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.