Write your message

XML Persian Abstract Print


1- SPI
2- Alabama university
Abstract:   (475 Views)
Accurate and reliable estimation of wave overtopping in coastal structures is crucial for their design and safety assessment. In this study, a new relationship for estimating wave overtopping in rubble mound breakwaters with Xbloc armor units is developed using numerical modeling and machine learning. The proposed method is based on supervised learning and nonlinear regression, following the general form of the Hibbertsgaard et al. model. To validate the model, the results of the proposed relationship were compared with experimental data as well as the Owen and Van der Meer formulas. The coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE) and the Index of Agreement (d) indicated that the proposed relationship showed a better correlation with experimental data. Numerical modeling was performed for eight different conditions, and in all cases, the proposed relationship demonstrated a better agreement with numerical outputs compared to previous empirical formulas. These results suggest that numerical modeling and machine learning can provide an accurate and cost-effective alternative to expensive and time-consuming physical experiments for deriving wave overtopping relationships. This study also specifically examines the effect of breakwater porosity, which has received less attention in previous research, and incorporates it into the proposed relationship. The findings indicate that the proposed method can serve as an efficient tool for developing more accurate wave overtopping relationships without the need for extensive physical modeling.
Full-Text [PDF 1554 kb]   (141 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Paper | Subject: Marine Structures and near shore
Received: 2024/12/14 | Accepted: 2025/03/3

References
1. J. W. van der Meer, J. P. F. M. Janssen, (1994), Hydraulics, Wave run-up and wave overtopping at dikes and revetments. Delft Hydraulics.
2. M. W. Owen, (1983), "The hydraulic design of sea-wall profiles," in Shoreline Protection, Thomas Telford Publishing, 1983, pp. 185-192.
3. T. S. Hedges, M. T. Reis, and M. W. OWEN, (1998), "RANDOM WAVE OVERTOPPING OF SIMPLE SEA WALLS: A NEW REGRESSION MODEL.," Proc. ICE-Water Marit. Energy, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 1-10. [DOI:10.1680/iwtme.1998.30223]
4. Y. Goda, (2010), Random seas and design of maritime structures, World Scientific. [DOI:10.1142/7425]
5. P. Besley, T. Stewart, and N. W. H. Allsop, (1998 ), Overtopping of vertical structures: new prediction methods to account for shallow water conditions, Proc. Coastlines, Struct. Break. London, UK, pp. 46-57. [DOI:10.1680/csab.26681.0005]
6. K. Hu, C. G. Mingham, and D. M. Causon, (2000 ), Numerical simulation of wave overtopping of coastal structures using the non-linear shallow water equations, Coast. Eng., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 433-465. [DOI:10.1016/S0378-3839(00)00040-5]
7. Hebsgaard, M., Sloth, P. and Juhl, J., 1999. Wave overtopping of rubble mound breakwaters. In Coastal Engineering 1998 (pp. 2235-2248). [DOI:10.1061/9780784404119.167]
8. Van der Meer, J.W., Bernardini, P., Snijders, W. and Regeling, E., 2007. The wave overtopping simulator. In Coastal Engineering 2006: (In 5 Volumes) (pp. 4654-4666). [DOI:10.1142/9789812709554_0390]
9. Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., & Stone, C. (1984). Cart. Classification and Regression Trees.
10. Gallach-Sánchez, D., Troch, P., & Kortenhaus, A. (2021). A new average wave overtopping prediction formula with improved accuracy for smooth steep low-crested structures. Coastal Engineering, 163, 103800. [DOI:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2020.103800]
11. Habib, M. A., O'Sullivan, J. J., & Salauddin, M. (2022). Prediction of Wave Overtopping Characteristics at Coastal Flood Defences Using Machine Learning Algorithms: A Systematic Rreview. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1072(1), 12003. [DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/1072/1/012003]
12. Van der Meer, Jentsje W, van Gent, M. R. A., Pozueta, B., Verhaeghe, H., Steendam, G.-J., & Medina, J. R. (2005). Applications of a neural network to predict wave overtopping at coastal structures. International Conference on Coastlines, Structures and Breakwaters 2005, 259-268.
13. Jafari, E., & Etemad-Shahidi, A. (2012). Derivation of a new model for prediction of wave overtopping at rubble mound structures. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 138(1), 42-52. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000099]
14. den Bieman, J. P., van Gent, M. R. A., & van den Boogaard, H. F. P. (2021). Wave overtopping predictions using an advanced machine learning technique. Coastal Engineering, 166, 103830. [DOI:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2020.103830]
15. Hosseinzadeh, S., Etemad-Shahidi, A., & Koosheh, A. (2021). Prediction of mean wave overtopping at simple sloped breakwaters using kernel-based methods. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 23(5), 1030-1049. [DOI:10.2166/hydro.2021.046]
16. Hogeveen, K.P.J., 2021. Climate Adaption of Rubble Mound Breakwaters.
17. Mousavi, S.A., Motalbi Zade, M.R., Shafeei Far, M. and Haj Momeni, A., (2014), Comparing The Performance Of Hydrodynamic And Structural Of Dezhpod Iranian Armour With X-Block Armour, ICOPMAS. (In Persian).
18. Ghasemi, A., Shafee Far, M., Panahi, R., (2016), "Numerical simulation of wave overtopping from armour breakwater by considering porous effect", International Journal of Maritime Technology, vol.11, no.22, pp.51-60. (In Persian)
19. J. H. Ferziger and M. Peric, (2012), Computational methods for fluid dynamics. Springer Science & Business Media.
20. Mahesh, B., 2020. Machine learning algorithms-a review. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR).[Internet], 9(1), pp.381-386. [DOI:10.21275/ART20203995]
21. Bishop, C.M. and Nasrabadi, N.M., 2006. Pattern recognition and machine learning (Vol. 4, No. 4, p. 738). New York: springer.
22. Van der Meer, J.W., Allsop, N.W.H., Bruce, T., De Rouck, J., Kortenhaus, A., Pullen, T., Schüttrumpf, H., Troch, P. and Zanuttigh, B., 2016. EurOtop-Manual on wave overtopping of sea defences and related structures. An overtopping manual largely based on European research, but for worldwide application.
23. Berendsen, H.J., 2011. A student's guide to data and error analysis. Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511921247]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
International Journal of Maritime Technology is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.