Write your message
Volume 15, Issue 29 (4-2019)                   Marine Engineering 2019, 15(29): 123-132 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Goodarzi S, Hamidi M, Dezvareh R. Investigation of the Float Body Geometry on the Power of Wave Energy Absorber Converter Using Mooring Catenary . Marine Engineering 2019; 15 (29) :123-132
URL: http://marine-eng.ir/article-1-721-en.html
1- Babol Noshirvani University of Technology
Abstract:   (3793 Views)
This paper presents the effect of hydrodynamic parameters of the two-body converters of a point wave absorber on the amount of power output. This converter includes two submerged and floating bodies which are connected to the spring-damper system. The whole of the converter is connected to the sea bed by mooring catenary. The relative displacement of the floating body and the submerged body is the main factor in generating electrical energy. Since the calculation of hydrodynamic coefficients has a significant effect on the solution of dynamic equations, this study focused on the calculation of added mass and hydrodynamic damping by boundary element method using the ANSYS-AQWA software. Also, this paper investigates the effect of floating borehole geometry on the hydrodynamic parameters and the extracted power of the converter using complementary analysis on the domain of time and frequency. Comparison of numerical simulation outputs and the results from the laboratory work which had carried out by Sandiego researchers in 2011, shows the suitable accuracy of the simulation. According to the results, with the two meters increase in buoy diameter, the power output will increase by 20%, and the output power for the half- conical is 17% more than the hemisphere.
Full-Text [PDF 1061 kb]   (2116 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Paper | Subject: Offshore Hydrodynamic
Received: 2019/04/8 | Accepted: 2019/08/3

References
1. Ringwood, J., (2008), Practical challenges in harvesting wave energy. Natural gas, 60, 70.
2. Dezvareh, R., Bargi, K., & Mousavi, S. A., (2016), Control of wind/wave-induced vibrations of jacket-type offshore wind turbines through tuned liquid column gas dampers. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 12(3), 312-326. [DOI:10.1080/15732479.2015.1011169]
3. Bargi, K., Dezvareh, R., & Mousavi, S. A. (2016), Contribution of tuned liquid column gas dampers to the performance of offshore wind turbines under wind, wave, and seismic excitations. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 15(3), 551-561. [DOI:10.1007/s11803-016-0343-z]
4. Dezvareh, R., (2019), Evaluation of turbulence on the dynamics of monopile offshore wind turbine under the wave and wind excitations. Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics, 5(4), 704-716.
5. Dong, W., Moan, T., & Gao, Z., (2012), Fatigue reliability analysis of the jacket support structure for offshore wind turbine considering the effect of corrosion and inspection. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 106, 11-27. [DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2012.06.011]
6. Carter, R. W., (2005), Wave energy converters and a submerged horizontal plate (Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa).
7. Cruz, J. & Elkinton, C., (2009), Oregon Wave Energy. Trust Utility Market Initiative. Oregan, USA.
8. McCormick, M. E., (1981), Ocean wave energy conversion. Wiley. New York.
9. Antonio,F.D.O, (2010), Wave¬ energy utilization: A review of the technologies. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 14(3), 899-918. [DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.003]
10. Budal,k, & Falnes, j., (1975), A resonant point absorber ofocean-wave power. Nature, 256(5517), 478-479. [DOI:10.1038/256478a0]
11. Evans, D. V., (1976), A theory for wave-power absorption by oscillating bodies. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 77(1), 1-25. [DOI:10.1017/S0022112076001109]
12. Mei, C. C., (1976), Power extraction from water waves. Journal of Ship Research, 20, 63-66.
13. Bret B., (2014). On the Design, Modeling, and Testing of Ocean Wave Energy Converters, PHD thesis, Oregon State University.
14. Fairies, J., (1999), Wave-energy conversion through relative motion between two single-mode oscillating bodies.
15. Leijon M, Boström C, Danielsson O, Gustafsson S, Haikonen K, Langhamer O, et al., (2008), Wave energy from the North Sea: experiences from the Lysekil research site. Surv Geophys;29:221-40. [DOI:10.1007/s10712-008-9047-x]
16. Eriksson M, Isberg J, Leijon M., (2005), Hydrodynamic modelling of a direct drive wave energy converter. Int J Eng Sci;43:1377-87 [DOI:10.1016/j.ijengsci.2005.05.014]
17. Gomes R, Henriques J, Gato L, Falcao A, others, (2010), IPS two-body wave energy converter: acceleration tube optimization. Proc 12th Inter Polar Eng:834-42.
18. Yu Y-H, Li Y. A RANS, (2011), simulation for the heave response of a two-body floating point wave absorber. In: 21st International offshore (ocean) and polar engineering conference, ISOPE, Maui, Hi, United States.
19. Li Y, Yu Y-H, Epler J, Previsic M., (2012), Experimental Investigation of the power generation performance of floating-point absorber wave energy systems, In: 27th Internationalworkshoponwater wavesand floating bodies,Copenhagen, Denmark.
20. Yu, Y.S.., Li, Y., (2014), Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes simulation of the heave performance of a two-body floating-point absorber wave energy system, J. Computers & Fluids, 73, 104-114 [DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.10.007]
21. Nazari M, Ghassemi H, Ghiasi M, Sayehbani M, (2013), Design of the Point Absorber Wave Energy Converter for Assaluyeh Port n.d. Iranica Journal of Energy & Environment, 4, 130135. DOI:10.5829/idosi.ijee.2013.04.02.09 [DOI:10.5829/idosi.ijee.2013.04.02.09]
22. Koh, H. J., Ruy, W. S., Cho, I. H., & Kweon, H. M., (2015), Multi-objective optimum design of a buoy for the resonant-type wave energy converter. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 20(1), 53-63. [DOI:10.1007/s00773-014-0268-z]
23. Pastor, J., & Liu, Y., (2014), Power absorption modeling and optimization of a point absorbing wave energy converter using numerical method. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 136(2), 021207. [DOI:10.1115/1.4027409]
24. Ruehl, K., Michelen, C., Kanner, S., Lawson, M., & Yu, Y. H., (2014), Preliminary verification and validation of WEC-Sim, an open-source wave energy converter design tool. In 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE, San Francisco, CA, United States (Abstract accepted). [DOI:10.1115/OMAE2014-24312]
25. Beirao P, Malça C, (2014), Design and analysis of buoy geometries for a wave energy converter. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 5, 1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s40095-014-0091-7 [DOI:10.1007/s40095-014-0091-7]
26. Lawson, M., Garzon, B. B., Wendt, F., Yu, Y. H., & Michelen, C., (2015), COER hydrodynamic modeling competition: Modeling the dynamic response of a floating body using the WEC-SIM and FAST simulation tools. In ASME 2015 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (pp. V009T09A005-V009T09A005). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
27. Shadman, M., Estefen, S. F., Rodriguez, C. A., & Nogueira, I. C., (2018), A geometrical optimization method applied to a heaving point absorber wave energy converter. Renewable energy, 115, 533-546. [DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2017.08.055]
28. Dezvareh, R., (2020), Upgrading the Seismic Capacity of Pile-Supported Wharfs Using Semi-Active Liquid Column Gas Damper. Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics, 6(1), 112-124.

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
International Journal of Maritime Technology is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.